Today is: Fri, Oct 31, 2014
 
Home
Book Reviews
Business
Calendar of Events
Classifieds
Community
Crime Stoppers
Editorial
Education
Entertainment
Environment
Features
Global
Government
Health
Home and Garden
Humor
Kidz Korner
Letters to the Editor
Miscellaneous
Musings with Mari
Op-Ed
People
Photo Gallery
Religion
Sound Bites
Sports
Travel & Leisure

About Us
Contact Us
Register
Login
Forum
Links
Submit News

 
Site Design by:


Home-->Government-->Kansas Senator supports Obamacare challenges
 
Kansas Senator supports Obamacare challenges s-little
Updated: 2014-02-06 11:47:46
WASHINGTON, DC -- U.S. Sen. Pat Roberts (R-Kansas) has signed an amicus brief in support of the challenges by Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Wood Specialties against Obamacare’s contraception mandate.

"Every American has a right to the free exercise of religion guaranteed by the First Amendment to our Constitution. This right has been upheld time and again by the Supreme Court over the last 200 years. It is offensive and unconscionable that this White House would put the politics of Obamacare ahead of Americans’ religious liberty," Senator Roberts said.

The brief filed in advance of the March 24, 2014, oral arguments challenging the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) mandate, was signed by 15 members of Congress, including Roberts, who also voted for the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA). The brief documents the numerous ways in which the Obama Administration has unilaterally ignored the text of the law, while at the same time failing to protect Americans’ religious liberties.

Roberts continued, "Forcing employers to provide services in direct conflict with their strongly held religious beliefs, while giving waivers on other onerous Obamacare provisions to the administration’s political allies is wrong, period. It is my hope the court will protect our rights and overturn Obamacare's overreaching contraception mandate."

In the brief, the authors write that, “The government’s refusal to apply RFRA throughout the administrative process has resulted in a mandate that violates RFRA and turns the law of religious freedom upside down. RFRA places a heavy burden on the government and protects religion by default. But the [Health and Human Services] mandate places a heavy burden on religion and protects the government by default.”

The full brief can be found here.

Go Back



Comments

You are currently not logged in. If you wish to post a comment, please first log in.

 ThreadAuthorViewsRepliesLast Post Date 

No comments yet.


 

 

 

 

 

Home  |  Login  |  Contact Us  |  Forum

© 2001-2014 Joplin Independent